Reach me while you can
Oh you lonely man
I'll give you something to believe
Meet me up in space
I'll help you find your place
If you can live on what we breathe
I know you're looking for
A way to be much more
And I'm the net to break your fall
You'll find your brothers here
They'll hold you fast and dear
If they find time to take your calls
Millions flock to me
Longing to be free
Trying to forget the past
They talk for hours and hours
Like they've got super powers
And maybe some of it will last
But deep inside my webs
The tide still flows and ebbs
A star still flickers out and fades
So let me take you up
I'll fill your every cup
And maybe someday we'll upgrade ...
To a better dream
A better dream
To a better dream
A better dream
Friday, April 25, 2008
Tuesday, April 22, 2008
Rehearsal
Huh. No sooner do I consider updating here than I notice that my last post was about how far to go with a song that, indeed, I rehearsed just last night.
The big change in my work recently is that I've picked up a bass player, whom I've rehearsed with several times, and last night "auditioned" an old guitarist friend ... and we played the song I discussed in my previous post, the political one.
Among other things.
My focus lately is not on the politics of that song, but on the fact that in the second verse (which is eight couplets rather than four like the first and third verses, for extra drama) I'm trying to jump up several steps (an octave, maybe??) halfway through the verse for EXTRA extra drama. And I'm consistently not in voice to sing it very well up there.
So there I am struggling with my vocals while also trying to hear whether the guitarist is doing something I want him to do.
Being a band leader is .... interesting. My bass player and I have good rapport, but I don't think it's giving away state secrets to say that having to teach him and work on things is sometimes, not frustrating so much, but ... dunno. Tests my limits a bit. I have to say things like "that was good but it doesn't work for me." When part of what I'm feeling is "OMG someone wants to play my songs, I shouldn't criticize ANYTHING they do."
The guitarist hauled out some nice licks last night that were COMPLETELY wrong for the song. Thank God he asked me, to my face, immediately afterward, "that was too western sounding, wasn't it?"
If I'd written a country song I would have fucking loved the part. It was good. It just didn't fit at all.
And I hate saying "no" to people, apparently.
But I'm learning.
And then he did some different stuff the next time and it was better.
And the bass parts are coming along nicely. A lot of it is about rehearsal now, for him.
Still. My god, what an effort sometimes. It's like I'm "on" all the time. I'm the boss. Nothing happens unless I make it happen.
It's not more difficult than doing it all myself. It's just DIFFERENTLY difficult.
Rewarding too, of course. The work with the guitarist was ... ragged .... if I think about the parts that need work or that I have to decide about. But he hauled out some things that a) I would never have thought of and b) that were like YAY when I heard them. I mean, I've worked with this guy before, I had a clue about what I was getting. Some of what he brings won't fit. Other stuff will be brilliant. I just have to see if I can get him to substitute anything that isn't brilliant right away with something else.
And I really need to figure out how to hit those high notes. They're within the range of my falsetto .... but I need to be able to figure out how to come up to them from the earlier lines that are down below them, and still project with power, without busting my throat.
Skills building .....
The big change in my work recently is that I've picked up a bass player, whom I've rehearsed with several times, and last night "auditioned" an old guitarist friend ... and we played the song I discussed in my previous post, the political one.
Among other things.
My focus lately is not on the politics of that song, but on the fact that in the second verse (which is eight couplets rather than four like the first and third verses, for extra drama) I'm trying to jump up several steps (an octave, maybe??) halfway through the verse for EXTRA extra drama. And I'm consistently not in voice to sing it very well up there.
So there I am struggling with my vocals while also trying to hear whether the guitarist is doing something I want him to do.
Being a band leader is .... interesting. My bass player and I have good rapport, but I don't think it's giving away state secrets to say that having to teach him and work on things is sometimes, not frustrating so much, but ... dunno. Tests my limits a bit. I have to say things like "that was good but it doesn't work for me." When part of what I'm feeling is "OMG someone wants to play my songs, I shouldn't criticize ANYTHING they do."
The guitarist hauled out some nice licks last night that were COMPLETELY wrong for the song. Thank God he asked me, to my face, immediately afterward, "that was too western sounding, wasn't it?"
If I'd written a country song I would have fucking loved the part. It was good. It just didn't fit at all.
And I hate saying "no" to people, apparently.
But I'm learning.
And then he did some different stuff the next time and it was better.
And the bass parts are coming along nicely. A lot of it is about rehearsal now, for him.
Still. My god, what an effort sometimes. It's like I'm "on" all the time. I'm the boss. Nothing happens unless I make it happen.
It's not more difficult than doing it all myself. It's just DIFFERENTLY difficult.
Rewarding too, of course. The work with the guitarist was ... ragged .... if I think about the parts that need work or that I have to decide about. But he hauled out some things that a) I would never have thought of and b) that were like YAY when I heard them. I mean, I've worked with this guy before, I had a clue about what I was getting. Some of what he brings won't fit. Other stuff will be brilliant. I just have to see if I can get him to substitute anything that isn't brilliant right away with something else.
And I really need to figure out how to hit those high notes. They're within the range of my falsetto .... but I need to be able to figure out how to come up to them from the earlier lines that are down below them, and still project with power, without busting my throat.
Skills building .....
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Politics and Art
Politics and art are a tricky combination.
When I was in graduate school I was a BIG fan of didactic, political art. And damn the torpedoes. My field was the turn of the 20th century in American literature, an era that had plenty of troubling issues worth an artist's time to think about and make art about. It was also the early 1990s, and although I wasn't out of the closet myself at that point, it was impossible not to notice the real issues going on around me, with HIV and AIDS, with government policy, with the end of the Cold War, and so on.
I was never NOT aware that putting strong political statements about the times you live in into your art can "date" your work as fast as clinging too tightly to an of-the-moment fashion. And the beauty and artistry of the art can suffer, too. It's easier to be strident and call people's attention to things than to delve into them in a way that connects heart AND head. Art's path to truth needn't be linear to be a true path. Didactic art can get too linear.
Still, didactic art that really tries to talk about Big Questions can be damned exciting. So I was often passionate in my defense of novels from my period that were not necessarily "great literature" but were literature AND great because they captured something about their times that "better" works didn't.
But now it comes time to make more art of my own and, not surprisingly, I have to wrestle with questions of whether and how to incorporate my personal convictions into my work, and whether the works in which I'm passionate but more vague are stronger than the ones in which I'm specific, and the specificity sometimes robs the work of the room for interpretation and personal reaction that can be the key to audience's really investing themselves and their own passions.
In theory one can have it all--if not in each work of art, then in the arc of one's whole career--but that merely defers the confrontation or moves it to a different level.
I've had a song kicking around for a couple of years, with the working title of "Good Men." It's a political song. I notice that I'm both attracted to it and have strong needs about it *because* of its political content, and that it scares me in ways that some of my other work doesn't. I think what's scary is the feeling that it would be all too easy to be crappy in this context. And many are the types of crap I could make.
The gist of the song, originally, was that I had gotten a little tired of seeing gay men ranting on internet hookup sites about how there were no "good men" out there. It's not that I don't know my share of bad gay dating stories, either ones that have happened to me or to my friends. But I know plenty of great gay men, so the lament about how there weren't ANY good men ANYWHERE often struck me as an overstatement. Look around. Great gay men are everywhere. Whether each of us is guaranteed one as a life partner, yeah, that's trickier, but it's a different question.
Thing is, the original thrust of the song was kind of snarky. And not in a good way. I'm blessed with a pretty good relationship, and so I don't have to wrestle with whatever feelings of loneliness might be troubling people who say "there are no good men." (Well. Except to the degree that one can feel lonely even in a relationship. But that's Adult Commitment 202 or 303, and the song was about Adult Dating 101, Male Same Sex Version.) It didn't feel particularly productive to write a song about how other people were whiny.
The thing that held my attention was the snippet of chorus I came up with. Which centered on a question: where are the good men we dream of?
At my age, although I came out just after the worst of the original HIV crisis, it's pretty hard not to recall how devastating that time was. I have one lover who is the ONLY person left alive from the friendship circle he came out into. And he's only a year older than I. It's become somewhat rote to talk about how an entire generation of gay and bisexual men was lost. Obviously it wasn't an ENTIRE generation .... I know several people in my own age bracket and older. But it was indeed a HUGE number of people. My ex Woody, who worked in GLBT community centers in the 1990s, can still talk about going to one or two memorial services a week. Often for people he'd known fairly well.
The answer to the question "where are the good men we dream of?" became pretty apparent to me the more I thought about it. "Gone."
As I say, this song has been kicking around for a while. Nearly three years ago, in the summer and fall of 2005, I was briefly in a band project with some friends from work. I know this tune was in the works at that point because I remember playing it for them.
Politics aren't the only tricky thing about art, of course: technique matters, too. My songwriting technique wasn't particularly solid at that point (whatever it may be now, it's definitely a lot better). The song didn't have so much a chord progression as a lead keyboard line that suggested a progression. My MIDI keyboard was the shiny new toy at that point and I was exploring it for all it was worth. And it was a GOOD lead riff (well. Decent, anyway. Very good considering my underlying skill level at the time). Problem was, the chorus and verse sounded a lot alike. And the melody over it was a bit repetitive.
The project fizzled out for a variety of reasons not long after that, and I filed the song away for future reference. Went on to other things, practiced my craft.
Beyond the musical limitations of the song, though, something else was troubling me. I was serious and passionate about the topic of how there was a generation of gay and bi men gone. It was something that we used to talk about the lingering impact of when I did men's health organizing. The lack of role models. The fact that a lot of gay and bi men my age are sort of "pioneering" the process of living into our 40s and 50s because so many men 10 or 20 years older than us never made it this far. How hard that feels.
Meanwhile, out in the rest of the world--which I'm never not noticing, even if I care a great deal about the queer communities--there's a whole 'nother series of crises putting young people in harm's way. Particularly the war in Iraq.
What blocked me about the song three years ago wasn't just the musical stuff I needed to get more experience about. There was a BIG part of me that didn't want to just write another impact-of-AIDS song. Not if it meant rehashing the 1980s and 1990s and ignoring my own time .... when friends are STILL vulnerable to HIV, but when there's a lot else going on too.
Trying to talk about the waste of human life due to indifference and apathy in ALL their forms--indifference to queer men, treating younger men and women as cannon fodder for wars whose justification never looked fully solid even at the outset, and dead wrong now .... well, that really was beyond my abilities.
Three years have gone by and I've taken another poke at it.
I feel quite a bit more confident now. Among other things, I have much better ideas about how to differentiate the verses and choruses. It hasn't taken me much effort to chuck some simple solutions at that part of the problem. ("Simple" now that I know more.)
The first verse of the old song contained some strong images that I've kept intact. And they've provided some jumping-off points for later verses.
I'm still ambivalent about the results. I have this funny feeling that nobody would necessarily perceive the original link to the history of the HIV crisis if I didn't write a long blog post about it. *I* know which lines in the first verse are directly about that.
The rest of the song sort of veers off into my frustration about the Iraq War and the culture of political inaction around it. Which I'm part of myself.
And a big part of me thinks that writing a song about how so many of us have been less active than we ought to have been is just one more failure to do enough.
I mean, I can't tell you how much I do NOT want to be one of those people who writes about saving the whales, or some other form of tilting at windmills, without really DOING something.
I fully believe that making political art IS a form of action. But it's a tricky one. It's VERY easy to get misled that you've accomplished more than you have.
And to make crappy art in the process. Failing at both the art AND the politics.
And yet, the song has a good shape in its current form. I can imagine investing my own emotion in the process of working on it further, of singing it. Sometimes the meaning of these things, and whatever impact they wind up having, comes out in the doing, not in the thinking about doing.
It may take on additional life if I sit and connect with it more deeply. If I open up more fully to the rage behind the frustrations I'm working out in writing it. Or if I put it across in a way that lets other people connect with whatever feelings THEY have about all this.
Or. Not.
Hard to tell, sometimes.
When I was in graduate school I was a BIG fan of didactic, political art. And damn the torpedoes. My field was the turn of the 20th century in American literature, an era that had plenty of troubling issues worth an artist's time to think about and make art about. It was also the early 1990s, and although I wasn't out of the closet myself at that point, it was impossible not to notice the real issues going on around me, with HIV and AIDS, with government policy, with the end of the Cold War, and so on.
I was never NOT aware that putting strong political statements about the times you live in into your art can "date" your work as fast as clinging too tightly to an of-the-moment fashion. And the beauty and artistry of the art can suffer, too. It's easier to be strident and call people's attention to things than to delve into them in a way that connects heart AND head. Art's path to truth needn't be linear to be a true path. Didactic art can get too linear.
Still, didactic art that really tries to talk about Big Questions can be damned exciting. So I was often passionate in my defense of novels from my period that were not necessarily "great literature" but were literature AND great because they captured something about their times that "better" works didn't.
But now it comes time to make more art of my own and, not surprisingly, I have to wrestle with questions of whether and how to incorporate my personal convictions into my work, and whether the works in which I'm passionate but more vague are stronger than the ones in which I'm specific, and the specificity sometimes robs the work of the room for interpretation and personal reaction that can be the key to audience's really investing themselves and their own passions.
In theory one can have it all--if not in each work of art, then in the arc of one's whole career--but that merely defers the confrontation or moves it to a different level.
I've had a song kicking around for a couple of years, with the working title of "Good Men." It's a political song. I notice that I'm both attracted to it and have strong needs about it *because* of its political content, and that it scares me in ways that some of my other work doesn't. I think what's scary is the feeling that it would be all too easy to be crappy in this context. And many are the types of crap I could make.
The gist of the song, originally, was that I had gotten a little tired of seeing gay men ranting on internet hookup sites about how there were no "good men" out there. It's not that I don't know my share of bad gay dating stories, either ones that have happened to me or to my friends. But I know plenty of great gay men, so the lament about how there weren't ANY good men ANYWHERE often struck me as an overstatement. Look around. Great gay men are everywhere. Whether each of us is guaranteed one as a life partner, yeah, that's trickier, but it's a different question.
Thing is, the original thrust of the song was kind of snarky. And not in a good way. I'm blessed with a pretty good relationship, and so I don't have to wrestle with whatever feelings of loneliness might be troubling people who say "there are no good men." (Well. Except to the degree that one can feel lonely even in a relationship. But that's Adult Commitment 202 or 303, and the song was about Adult Dating 101, Male Same Sex Version.) It didn't feel particularly productive to write a song about how other people were whiny.
The thing that held my attention was the snippet of chorus I came up with. Which centered on a question: where are the good men we dream of?
At my age, although I came out just after the worst of the original HIV crisis, it's pretty hard not to recall how devastating that time was. I have one lover who is the ONLY person left alive from the friendship circle he came out into. And he's only a year older than I. It's become somewhat rote to talk about how an entire generation of gay and bisexual men was lost. Obviously it wasn't an ENTIRE generation .... I know several people in my own age bracket and older. But it was indeed a HUGE number of people. My ex Woody, who worked in GLBT community centers in the 1990s, can still talk about going to one or two memorial services a week. Often for people he'd known fairly well.
The answer to the question "where are the good men we dream of?" became pretty apparent to me the more I thought about it. "Gone."
As I say, this song has been kicking around for a while. Nearly three years ago, in the summer and fall of 2005, I was briefly in a band project with some friends from work. I know this tune was in the works at that point because I remember playing it for them.
Politics aren't the only tricky thing about art, of course: technique matters, too. My songwriting technique wasn't particularly solid at that point (whatever it may be now, it's definitely a lot better). The song didn't have so much a chord progression as a lead keyboard line that suggested a progression. My MIDI keyboard was the shiny new toy at that point and I was exploring it for all it was worth. And it was a GOOD lead riff (well. Decent, anyway. Very good considering my underlying skill level at the time). Problem was, the chorus and verse sounded a lot alike. And the melody over it was a bit repetitive.
The project fizzled out for a variety of reasons not long after that, and I filed the song away for future reference. Went on to other things, practiced my craft.
Beyond the musical limitations of the song, though, something else was troubling me. I was serious and passionate about the topic of how there was a generation of gay and bi men gone. It was something that we used to talk about the lingering impact of when I did men's health organizing. The lack of role models. The fact that a lot of gay and bi men my age are sort of "pioneering" the process of living into our 40s and 50s because so many men 10 or 20 years older than us never made it this far. How hard that feels.
Meanwhile, out in the rest of the world--which I'm never not noticing, even if I care a great deal about the queer communities--there's a whole 'nother series of crises putting young people in harm's way. Particularly the war in Iraq.
What blocked me about the song three years ago wasn't just the musical stuff I needed to get more experience about. There was a BIG part of me that didn't want to just write another impact-of-AIDS song. Not if it meant rehashing the 1980s and 1990s and ignoring my own time .... when friends are STILL vulnerable to HIV, but when there's a lot else going on too.
Trying to talk about the waste of human life due to indifference and apathy in ALL their forms--indifference to queer men, treating younger men and women as cannon fodder for wars whose justification never looked fully solid even at the outset, and dead wrong now .... well, that really was beyond my abilities.
Three years have gone by and I've taken another poke at it.
I feel quite a bit more confident now. Among other things, I have much better ideas about how to differentiate the verses and choruses. It hasn't taken me much effort to chuck some simple solutions at that part of the problem. ("Simple" now that I know more.)
The first verse of the old song contained some strong images that I've kept intact. And they've provided some jumping-off points for later verses.
I'm still ambivalent about the results. I have this funny feeling that nobody would necessarily perceive the original link to the history of the HIV crisis if I didn't write a long blog post about it. *I* know which lines in the first verse are directly about that.
The rest of the song sort of veers off into my frustration about the Iraq War and the culture of political inaction around it. Which I'm part of myself.
And a big part of me thinks that writing a song about how so many of us have been less active than we ought to have been is just one more failure to do enough.
I mean, I can't tell you how much I do NOT want to be one of those people who writes about saving the whales, or some other form of tilting at windmills, without really DOING something.
I fully believe that making political art IS a form of action. But it's a tricky one. It's VERY easy to get misled that you've accomplished more than you have.
And to make crappy art in the process. Failing at both the art AND the politics.
And yet, the song has a good shape in its current form. I can imagine investing my own emotion in the process of working on it further, of singing it. Sometimes the meaning of these things, and whatever impact they wind up having, comes out in the doing, not in the thinking about doing.
It may take on additional life if I sit and connect with it more deeply. If I open up more fully to the rage behind the frustrations I'm working out in writing it. Or if I put it across in a way that lets other people connect with whatever feelings THEY have about all this.
Or. Not.
Hard to tell, sometimes.
Monday, March 24, 2008
Top Of My Lungs
I think it was the Behind The Music episode on Heart in which Ann Wilson talked about having to *discover* that high-powered voice of hers. Apparently she and Nancy had been playing and singing for years, as kids, but it wasn't until they got the band together and started playing live that Ann was pushed by circumstance to really reach for some of those high-notes-with-power that she's well known for.
I'm thinking about this because I'm pushing myself to keep at my vocal technique. It's a truism that most untrained singers sing too low in their range (or below it). I took no more than five "adult education" singing classes twenty years ago and that was one of the FIRST things the teacher told us. She said it's particularly true for men, who believe that we're supposed to have lower voices than (whoever).
Nevertheless, when I started writing and singing my own songs I often composed fairly low in my range. A) There's any number of bass and baritone rock singers whose tone I admire (Philip Oakey, Stephin Merritt, etc), and B) it genuinely felt more comfortable.
More than one friend has reported back to me that the songs in which I reach higher in my range happen to be the ones that work better for them. And that some of the low songs don't work. No matter how I feel about my voice, this is good information.
I've often felt kind of like the comment that Geena Davis makes about her kid sister in A League Of Their Own regarding high pitches: can't hit 'em, can't lay off 'em. Except for me it's the LOW pitches. ;-)
Since I have no objection to learning to sing better *anywhere* in my range, though--other than some emotional discomfort I know better than to give in to--I've kept at working the higher end of my range as well.
Yesterday I came home from brunch with a good friend and the house was empty, so I plugged in my guitar and started rocking out live on some of the new songs I'm working on. Part of the process I'm trying to go through this time it to have played and sung these things more often before committing them to media.
Got partway through one song that isn't too low in my range, necessarily (the new material incorporates some of my learning about where I should place my voice better) .... but started to feel as if I was missing a bet by not letting myself go higher. But I'm not quite smart enough to change keys on the fly. So I just went up an octave.
And, perhaps a little like Ann Wilson, I found I had some notes in me that I hadn't thought of.
Everything wasn't fabulous .... the verse I was in ends on some high notes that maybe *aren't* in my range, if I'm up in that octave. (Or that I'll have to keep working at.) Maybe I'd have to re-key the song down a step to be able to go up an octave. I probably want to sing the earlier verse in the original octave, save the reaching-higher for the middle bit. That would suit the emotional arc of the tune.
Still. Some high notes. Pretty good tone and pitch. Loud, too.
I was all kind of "whoah." That was me singing that. Interesting.
Practice makes better.
I'm thinking about this because I'm pushing myself to keep at my vocal technique. It's a truism that most untrained singers sing too low in their range (or below it). I took no more than five "adult education" singing classes twenty years ago and that was one of the FIRST things the teacher told us. She said it's particularly true for men, who believe that we're supposed to have lower voices than (whoever).
Nevertheless, when I started writing and singing my own songs I often composed fairly low in my range. A) There's any number of bass and baritone rock singers whose tone I admire (Philip Oakey, Stephin Merritt, etc), and B) it genuinely felt more comfortable.
More than one friend has reported back to me that the songs in which I reach higher in my range happen to be the ones that work better for them. And that some of the low songs don't work. No matter how I feel about my voice, this is good information.
I've often felt kind of like the comment that Geena Davis makes about her kid sister in A League Of Their Own regarding high pitches: can't hit 'em, can't lay off 'em. Except for me it's the LOW pitches. ;-)
Since I have no objection to learning to sing better *anywhere* in my range, though--other than some emotional discomfort I know better than to give in to--I've kept at working the higher end of my range as well.
Yesterday I came home from brunch with a good friend and the house was empty, so I plugged in my guitar and started rocking out live on some of the new songs I'm working on. Part of the process I'm trying to go through this time it to have played and sung these things more often before committing them to media.
Got partway through one song that isn't too low in my range, necessarily (the new material incorporates some of my learning about where I should place my voice better) .... but started to feel as if I was missing a bet by not letting myself go higher. But I'm not quite smart enough to change keys on the fly. So I just went up an octave.
And, perhaps a little like Ann Wilson, I found I had some notes in me that I hadn't thought of.
Everything wasn't fabulous .... the verse I was in ends on some high notes that maybe *aren't* in my range, if I'm up in that octave. (Or that I'll have to keep working at.) Maybe I'd have to re-key the song down a step to be able to go up an octave. I probably want to sing the earlier verse in the original octave, save the reaching-higher for the middle bit. That would suit the emotional arc of the tune.
Still. Some high notes. Pretty good tone and pitch. Loud, too.
I was all kind of "whoah." That was me singing that. Interesting.
Practice makes better.
Friday, March 21, 2008
Continuing On
How things change when you forget to update your secondary blog in a while. Today I'm taking a break from Live Journal (there's a bit of a political protest going on because LJ's new owners have showed some cluelessness about customer relations, combined with some actions that make some folks worried that the cluelessness is the flip side of some potential censorship). So here I am, and I notice that I've said almost nothing about how productive and interesting the last few weeks have been.
Well, they have. In my last post here, I noticed that I'd broken a bit of a creative logjam. Boy, did I ever. I finally got a LOT of my semi-finished music tracks into a "finished" state. As with anything like this, I can think of a billion things that I wish I'd done better with those tracks. But it was time to let them go, put them out in the world, stop fiddling with them. So I did.
The end result was a almost-thirty-minute-long collection of instrumentals with a linking motif or two that I called "Themes For A Defunct Leather Bar," and an almost-hour-long collection of "pop songs" released as "Spring Hill Light And Power." Both went up on a new web site, http://www.dirigibleego.com, for my Dirigible Ego "band" project.
Um. Yeah. 90 minutes of music.
I've been getting positive comments on the material from various friends. Including from other musicians, *including* from people whose own work had been among my inspirations over the last few years. So while I'm still intensely aware, at times, of "how the song sounds in my head" versus "how it REALLY sounds out in the world," I can't deny that people have had positive reactions to what I've done. Sometimes unexpected ones .... in the sense that, sure, people are interested in part because they're my friends, but when they mention liking a track that I was ambivalent about (which. um. could be ANY of them, on any given day), or when they're moved by something I wrote. Yeah. That's good.
In particular, as I keep saying, I got a lot more confidence in my vocals, and more skill at rendering them well.
So that was a couple of weeks ago, and things have moved right along. I think I said, in my last post, that I was hoping to get some things out the door because I was getting backlogged on "new" material and wanted to stop obsessing over the old stuff. That remains the case. My Nano this morning carries draft demos of five new songs, and that isn't all of what I've got in work.
Add to that: one friend has stepped forward recently to say that he'd like to play with me. He likes my stuff, he wants to contribute ... and he's actually *come over* to the house twice now to start rehearsing.
This is kind of a big deal. A *number* of my friends have said, in the past, that they'd like to collaborate with me. Sometime. But most of them have lived at a distance, and *all* of them are at least as busy as I am. Or something seems to get in the way. More than once I've emailed someone a track I was working on and ... not heard for a long time. I've gotten VERY good at talking back to the little voices inside that say "they wanted to work with you until they heard how weak your material is." It's life: there are a lot of people I would "want to" work with that I haven't, or don't have time to. It's not really a comment on anything other than the impossibility of having it all. (Good lord, my family member Pepper has been *begging* me to play music with her for *years*. I just can't get motivated .... we're stylistically distinct enough that it just hasn't called to me yet.)
So to have someone actively seeking to work with me, because he likes what I'm doing. Yeah. That's really great.
It's a very new collaboration, it's already forcing me to take leadership and ownership of what I do. That's new territory, a bit scary, so I haven't made any big announcements about who it is or that we're working together. I need to give it time to breathe, time to let myself inhabit it.
But it's really awesome.
Of course, I'm laying down vocals for some of these new demos and thinking "Gah. I'm much better than I WAS and not at all where I WANT TO BE." ;-) So the struggle continues.
Still. These new demos represent so many levels of improvement over the past, in terms of imagination and how fast I can get new clunky ideas out and less-clunky.
Truly, for all the self-doubt (that I suspect I would carry around with me even if I were, let's say, Bono), my God, I seem to get a lot done.
Well, they have. In my last post here, I noticed that I'd broken a bit of a creative logjam. Boy, did I ever. I finally got a LOT of my semi-finished music tracks into a "finished" state. As with anything like this, I can think of a billion things that I wish I'd done better with those tracks. But it was time to let them go, put them out in the world, stop fiddling with them. So I did.
The end result was a almost-thirty-minute-long collection of instrumentals with a linking motif or two that I called "Themes For A Defunct Leather Bar," and an almost-hour-long collection of "pop songs" released as "Spring Hill Light And Power." Both went up on a new web site, http://www.dirigibleego.com, for my Dirigible Ego "band" project.
Um. Yeah. 90 minutes of music.
I've been getting positive comments on the material from various friends. Including from other musicians, *including* from people whose own work had been among my inspirations over the last few years. So while I'm still intensely aware, at times, of "how the song sounds in my head" versus "how it REALLY sounds out in the world," I can't deny that people have had positive reactions to what I've done. Sometimes unexpected ones .... in the sense that, sure, people are interested in part because they're my friends, but when they mention liking a track that I was ambivalent about (which. um. could be ANY of them, on any given day), or when they're moved by something I wrote. Yeah. That's good.
In particular, as I keep saying, I got a lot more confidence in my vocals, and more skill at rendering them well.
So that was a couple of weeks ago, and things have moved right along. I think I said, in my last post, that I was hoping to get some things out the door because I was getting backlogged on "new" material and wanted to stop obsessing over the old stuff. That remains the case. My Nano this morning carries draft demos of five new songs, and that isn't all of what I've got in work.
Add to that: one friend has stepped forward recently to say that he'd like to play with me. He likes my stuff, he wants to contribute ... and he's actually *come over* to the house twice now to start rehearsing.
This is kind of a big deal. A *number* of my friends have said, in the past, that they'd like to collaborate with me. Sometime. But most of them have lived at a distance, and *all* of them are at least as busy as I am. Or something seems to get in the way. More than once I've emailed someone a track I was working on and ... not heard for a long time. I've gotten VERY good at talking back to the little voices inside that say "they wanted to work with you until they heard how weak your material is." It's life: there are a lot of people I would "want to" work with that I haven't, or don't have time to. It's not really a comment on anything other than the impossibility of having it all. (Good lord, my family member Pepper has been *begging* me to play music with her for *years*. I just can't get motivated .... we're stylistically distinct enough that it just hasn't called to me yet.)
So to have someone actively seeking to work with me, because he likes what I'm doing. Yeah. That's really great.
It's a very new collaboration, it's already forcing me to take leadership and ownership of what I do. That's new territory, a bit scary, so I haven't made any big announcements about who it is or that we're working together. I need to give it time to breathe, time to let myself inhabit it.
But it's really awesome.
Of course, I'm laying down vocals for some of these new demos and thinking "Gah. I'm much better than I WAS and not at all where I WANT TO BE." ;-) So the struggle continues.
Still. These new demos represent so many levels of improvement over the past, in terms of imagination and how fast I can get new clunky ideas out and less-clunky.
Truly, for all the self-doubt (that I suspect I would carry around with me even if I were, let's say, Bono), my God, I seem to get a lot done.
Monday, January 28, 2008
Breakthrough
This blog hasn't focused on music quite as much recently, but I've been working away. Yesterday I had a bit of a breakthrough.
What with being in California for two weeks at New Year's--where I didn't have access to musical instruments, other than a default training keyboard my brother has for the kids, but which they keep in the parental bedroom so the kids don't pound on it--and then somewhat sick on and off when I returned, plus the fact that I've gotten turned on to doing some painting again .... with all that, I hadn't done much with music so far in 2008. Not the end of the world, these things come and go. But before Christmas I'd been trying to put some time in on things every day when I could, treating it less as something to do when "inspired" and more as a daily part of life. I'd been missing music when I was away, but once I was back ....
Also, over the last couple of years, I've built up quite a stock of semi-finished tracks. It's nearing two years since I took my current job, which required me to buy a Mac (since I support those at work), which led me to Garageband, which got me doing more recording. But very few tracks have gotten finished. I'd been intending to put some of them to rest at last, and here I was not working.
When I was home sick the week before last, that started to break a little bit. But it broke with me listening to old records and wanting to cover those songs. Which is fine, but not the same as working on my stuff. Still .... Gary Numan's Replicas album got me to turn my keyboard back on, bless it.
And then I started fooling around with some riffs of my own. New ones ... which, again, is NOT the same as working on existing material. But: another step closer.
Yesterday, though, I had a big breakthrough. I woke up to an empty house, Alan and Pepper already having left for church. I find it easier to record vocals when I'm alone--something I'm sure I need to get over, but these things take time. And it's definitely easier to do any even noisier stuff with an empty house. So I thought to myself, well, let's get a little done.
The latest Garageband has more flexibility for doing looped recording, which is especially helpful for vocal takes. I hadn't really explored this feature, so I went after it.
And suddenly I was getting a LOT done, on a variety of tracks.
I can't recall if I've blogged about my ambivalence about vocal recording, previously. I don't know too many singers who *don't* have some ambivalence about their own voices, so it's kind of redundant to speak of, but it's something I've been confronting a lot over the last couple of years. I think the "experimental" nature of how I started out yesterday helped me avoid a little vocal tension I have sometimes carried into other sessions, even at home alone. And the ability to do multiple takes at a time was a huge relief.
I consistently made myself do three or four takes at a go, even if I thought the first or second was good enough. Good discipline!
Alan and Pepper were out for quite a while, so even as my voice started to wear out, I was checking through other tracks, listening for instrumental things I could work on as well.
I've been intending, for a while now, to put out a CD of my various songs. I don't pretend that I am an especially skilled recording engineer, so I know that the sound quality of such a collection will be variable. But I'm at the stage where I have a variety of solid pop songs in place, assuming I just **make myself finish some of them**--writing more lyrics for songs that need them, recording better takes of vocals, and just plain **letting go***. I want to get something out there so my friends who are interested can hear .... and so I can clear the decks, stop working on those songs (unless a recording contract should fall from the sky, or I put a band together to take them to the next level, or whatever). Be ready to move on to newer material without feeling like I'm simply abandoning so many half-finished efforts.
Heh. I say "pop songs" .... well, some of them were written as basic pop songs, and work decently as such. Others are more experimental. I guess, in the back of my mind, I've sort of being hoping to write more well-formed pop songs to go with the experiments, on the theory that I could end up with a record kind of like the second Human League album, "Travelogue," which mixes some slightly out-there instrumentals with some VERY out-there songs that, nevertheless, are all based on pop-song forms.
Maybe the most recent Human League album, "Secrets," is a better model: it harks back to "Travelogue" in mixing pop songs and instrumentals, but the pop is a little less weird, given Phil Oakey's greater interest in standard pop songs than the other original Human League members.
Anyway ....
I have more semi-complete pop songs than I thought I did (I mean, I knew I had a bunch, but I get so focused on the ones I'm most interested in lately, I lose track of how many others there are) and a BUNCH of interesting little experiments. Many of which are in very good shape.
So all of a sudden, it's sort of an embarrassment of riches. Rough-hewn, often silly .... wow, I wrote some VERY silly songs a year ago .... but I have a collection.
I just need to polish a few of them up (the ones that need or can even benefit from said polishing) and then let them go.
What with being in California for two weeks at New Year's--where I didn't have access to musical instruments, other than a default training keyboard my brother has for the kids, but which they keep in the parental bedroom so the kids don't pound on it--and then somewhat sick on and off when I returned, plus the fact that I've gotten turned on to doing some painting again .... with all that, I hadn't done much with music so far in 2008. Not the end of the world, these things come and go. But before Christmas I'd been trying to put some time in on things every day when I could, treating it less as something to do when "inspired" and more as a daily part of life. I'd been missing music when I was away, but once I was back ....
Also, over the last couple of years, I've built up quite a stock of semi-finished tracks. It's nearing two years since I took my current job, which required me to buy a Mac (since I support those at work), which led me to Garageband, which got me doing more recording. But very few tracks have gotten finished. I'd been intending to put some of them to rest at last, and here I was not working.
When I was home sick the week before last, that started to break a little bit. But it broke with me listening to old records and wanting to cover those songs. Which is fine, but not the same as working on my stuff. Still .... Gary Numan's Replicas album got me to turn my keyboard back on, bless it.
And then I started fooling around with some riffs of my own. New ones ... which, again, is NOT the same as working on existing material. But: another step closer.
Yesterday, though, I had a big breakthrough. I woke up to an empty house, Alan and Pepper already having left for church. I find it easier to record vocals when I'm alone--something I'm sure I need to get over, but these things take time. And it's definitely easier to do any even noisier stuff with an empty house. So I thought to myself, well, let's get a little done.
The latest Garageband has more flexibility for doing looped recording, which is especially helpful for vocal takes. I hadn't really explored this feature, so I went after it.
And suddenly I was getting a LOT done, on a variety of tracks.
I can't recall if I've blogged about my ambivalence about vocal recording, previously. I don't know too many singers who *don't* have some ambivalence about their own voices, so it's kind of redundant to speak of, but it's something I've been confronting a lot over the last couple of years. I think the "experimental" nature of how I started out yesterday helped me avoid a little vocal tension I have sometimes carried into other sessions, even at home alone. And the ability to do multiple takes at a time was a huge relief.
I consistently made myself do three or four takes at a go, even if I thought the first or second was good enough. Good discipline!
Alan and Pepper were out for quite a while, so even as my voice started to wear out, I was checking through other tracks, listening for instrumental things I could work on as well.
I've been intending, for a while now, to put out a CD of my various songs. I don't pretend that I am an especially skilled recording engineer, so I know that the sound quality of such a collection will be variable. But I'm at the stage where I have a variety of solid pop songs in place, assuming I just **make myself finish some of them**--writing more lyrics for songs that need them, recording better takes of vocals, and just plain **letting go***. I want to get something out there so my friends who are interested can hear .... and so I can clear the decks, stop working on those songs (unless a recording contract should fall from the sky, or I put a band together to take them to the next level, or whatever). Be ready to move on to newer material without feeling like I'm simply abandoning so many half-finished efforts.
Heh. I say "pop songs" .... well, some of them were written as basic pop songs, and work decently as such. Others are more experimental. I guess, in the back of my mind, I've sort of being hoping to write more well-formed pop songs to go with the experiments, on the theory that I could end up with a record kind of like the second Human League album, "Travelogue," which mixes some slightly out-there instrumentals with some VERY out-there songs that, nevertheless, are all based on pop-song forms.
Maybe the most recent Human League album, "Secrets," is a better model: it harks back to "Travelogue" in mixing pop songs and instrumentals, but the pop is a little less weird, given Phil Oakey's greater interest in standard pop songs than the other original Human League members.
Anyway ....
I have more semi-complete pop songs than I thought I did (I mean, I knew I had a bunch, but I get so focused on the ones I'm most interested in lately, I lose track of how many others there are) and a BUNCH of interesting little experiments. Many of which are in very good shape.
So all of a sudden, it's sort of an embarrassment of riches. Rough-hewn, often silly .... wow, I wrote some VERY silly songs a year ago .... but I have a collection.
I just need to polish a few of them up (the ones that need or can even benefit from said polishing) and then let them go.
Wednesday, January 16, 2008
Drat!
I wish this blog didn't risk sounding like a broken record, but I seem to be in relatively low spirits today. Since that was my frame of mind last time I posted here, it could seem like it's my permanent condition. Actually, I had a good two-week vacation in between, which lifted my spirits a lot.
It's just the couple of days since I came home that have been increasingly drab.
I suspect it's the weather. Really, really. It kind of sucks to think how important that feels. This morning it's sunny and I'd love to think my mood would rise with the light. But it's also cold and the days are short. Whereas when I was in California and it was warmer and the days slightly longer, hey presto, I did better.
Sure, the rigors of a full time job may apply as well. But honestly, my job is just not that tough, and there are many aspects of it I enjoy. I am having a hard time believing that the plummet in my mood the last couple of days is just about "waaah, I have to sit at a desk."
Yesterday afternoon I was overtaken by a growing sense of disillusionment or .... despair?? I don't know quite what to call it. It only sharpened as I traveled homeward, even as I looked forward to being home and cocooning. I sidestepped some of it by doing pleasant things once I was home, but there was part of me that kept looking at the clock thinking "is it too early to go to sleep? Should I just turn in?"
I woke rested but not in better spirits. This morning, I'm getting things done and carrying on, but I feel bleakish.
It really sucks.
It's just the couple of days since I came home that have been increasingly drab.
I suspect it's the weather. Really, really. It kind of sucks to think how important that feels. This morning it's sunny and I'd love to think my mood would rise with the light. But it's also cold and the days are short. Whereas when I was in California and it was warmer and the days slightly longer, hey presto, I did better.
Sure, the rigors of a full time job may apply as well. But honestly, my job is just not that tough, and there are many aspects of it I enjoy. I am having a hard time believing that the plummet in my mood the last couple of days is just about "waaah, I have to sit at a desk."
Yesterday afternoon I was overtaken by a growing sense of disillusionment or .... despair?? I don't know quite what to call it. It only sharpened as I traveled homeward, even as I looked forward to being home and cocooning. I sidestepped some of it by doing pleasant things once I was home, but there was part of me that kept looking at the clock thinking "is it too early to go to sleep? Should I just turn in?"
I woke rested but not in better spirits. This morning, I'm getting things done and carrying on, but I feel bleakish.
It really sucks.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
